⬢ For engineering teams running multi-provider LLM stacks

Migration Audit.
20 hours. $5,000.
Reusable scaffold.

Multi-provider API fluency at fixed fee. Same team runs the 22-seat agentic Parliament in production with tool layer · trace capture · provider rotation across 4 cloud lanes.
If you're moving from OpenAI to Anthropic, splitting traffic across providers for cost or reliability, or evaluating which frontier model wins on YOUR workload — this is the engagement that delivers the answer in 20 hours, not 6 weeks.
$5,000
Fixed fee · 20 hours · 5 business days · Reusable scaffold delivered
⬢ Hard time-cap
⬢ Fixed deliverable
⬢ Scaffold + tests committed
⬢ Stripe payment · 50% upfront
⬡ Book Migration Audit · $5,000 →
Or book a free 30-min scoping call first · response within 24h
consulting@emaaa.io · response within 24h

⬢ Three engagement patterns

PATTERN 1

OpenAI → Anthropic Migration

You're hitting GPT rate limits, costs, or reliability ceiling and need to move workloads to Claude. We benchmark your top 5 prompt patterns head-to-head, deliver an annotated diff of behavioral deltas, and ship Terraform + adapter scaffolding. Most teams take this in-house in 4-6 weeks. We deliver in 5 business days.

PATTERN 2

Single → Multi-Provider Routing

You're locked to one provider and want cost / reliability hedging. We run your top workloads across 4 frontier-model providers, surface where each wins by metric (cost · latency · quality on YOUR rubric), and ship a routing config + observability dashboard. Same scaffolding we use for our own Parliament.

PATTERN 3

Frontier Model Eval on Your Workload

You can't decide between Claude 4.6 / GPT-5 / Gemini 3.1 / Llama 405B / DeepSeek V3.2 for production. We run your representative workloads through our 22-seat Parliament + Council annotation, deliver an outlier-failure report, and recommend the routing pattern that maximizes your specific value function.

⬢ What you get vs. what you don't

In scope (20 hours · 5 business days)

  • 30-min scoping call · NDA signed if needed
  • Workload analysis: 5 representative prompts/flows from your stack
  • Cross-provider benchmark (top 4 frontier models on your workload)
  • Annotated comparison report (cost · latency · quality deltas)
  • Working scaffold: Terraform module + provider adapter + integration test
  • Recommendation memo with go/no-go decision tree
  • One review session at end · 60 min · followup notes within 24h

Out of scope (engage separately)

  • Full production migration execution (we deliver the scaffold · your team ships it)
  • Custom model fine-tuning
  • RAG architecture review (separate engagement)
  • Compliance / SOC 2 / GDPR audit (separate engagement · we partner with specialists)
  • On-call SLA / incident response (subscription tier)
  • White-label resale of the scaffold (license separately)

⬢ Tiered packages

DISCOVERY

Strategy Call

$500
90 minutes · pre-scoping
  • Architecture review of your current LLM stack
  • Cost-benchmark estimate (where you're overpaying)
  • Provider-rotation feasibility assessment
  • Written recommendations memo within 48h
  • Credited against any Migration Audit booked within 30 days
Book strategy call →
CORE

Migration Audit

$5,000
20 hours · 5 business days · scaffold delivered
  • One pattern of your choice (OpenAI→Anthropic / Multi-Provider / Frontier Eval)
  • 5 workload patterns benchmarked across 4 providers
  • Working Terraform + adapter + integration test
  • Annotated comparison report
  • Recommendation memo with go/no-go decision tree
  • 60-min review + 24h followup
Book audit →
EXTENDED

Implementation Support

$12,500
50 hours · pair-programming on your migration
  • Migration Audit included (above)
  • Pair-programming for actual production migration
  • Incident-response on-call for first 7 days post-launch
  • Three follow-up reviews (week 2 · week 4 · week 8)
  • Capped at 50 hours · overage billed at $200/hr
Book extended →

⬢ Why us

Production receipts, not slides. The team running this consultancy ships and operates the live MirzaTech Parliament — 22 frontier-model seats across 4 provider lanes (NVIDIA NIM · Groq · OpenRouter · Novita). The same routing logic, fallback patterns, and trace capture you'd want in YOUR stack are running in ours, in production, today.

Reusable artifacts forced by the engagement model. Every audit produces a Terraform module + adapter + integration test committed to a git repo you own. Not a slide deck. Not a PDF. Code that runs.

Hard time cap is the feature. 20 hours / 5 business days / fixed fee. We over-deliver when scaffolding is reusable across clients (you benefit · we amortize). We exit when the cap hits. No scope creep. No surprise invoices.

See the Parliament live Council architecture Provider Dashboard Cost-pass-through pricing

⬢ Consulting FAQ

Why $5,000 fixed and not hourly?
Hourly billing creates incentive misalignment. We do the work; you pay for the outcome. If we finish in 12 hours instead of 20, you keep the savings. If we hit the 20-hour cap before the audit is done, we eat the overage on this engagement (and refine the scaffold so the next client benefits).
Who owns the deliverables?
You. The Terraform · adapter · tests · report — all yours, MIT-licensed equivalent assignment. The underlying scaffolding patterns we develop across multiple engagements remain ours (so we can amortize); the specific instantiation for your stack is yours.
Can you sign an NDA / MNDA?
Standard one-way or mutual NDA, yes. Fortune-500 master services agreements: case-by-case (we're a small team · 30-day legal review minimum). For most engagements, our standard MNDA covers it.
What's the booking process?
Email consulting@emaaa.io with one paragraph on your stack + the question you want answered. We reply within 24h with a 30-min scoping call slot. After that call, we send a fixed-fee statement of work (within 24h). 50% deposit via Stripe to lock the slot, 50% on delivery.
What if my problem doesn't fit the three patterns?
Reply to this page with your specific question. If it fits within the 20-hour scope of work and we have the relevant expertise, we'll quote it. If not, we'll tell you which specialist firm to talk to (we have a small referral network).
How does this relate to the Parliament and Council products?
Different surface, same expertise. The platform is self-serve · the consulting is white-glove for teams who need a specific answer this week. Many consulting clients later become Parliament + Council customers (they've already seen what the infrastructure does).